I wanted to write an article on a couple of drugs that I have heard about recently, both on the radio, and the side effects. My husband asked me, “What does this have to do with life in the foothills?” My answer: Nothing, except I hear the ads on the radio and I find myself astounded. Why would anyone want to take a drug that has these side effects? I write about this because if anyone would suffer the “rare” side effects, it would be me and has been me.
Recently I have heard ads for two syndromes that I did not know were considered syndromes until the drug companies decided they were. What are they? One is restless leg syndrome, and the other is shift work disorder.
What is restless leg disorder, otherwise known as RLS? It is defined as “A disorder in which there is an urge or need to move the legs to stop unpleasant sensations.” Wait a minute! I have had this all my life. More than 50 years worth. Did it ever bother me? No. Did it bother others? Sometimes. So, why now is this a big deal? Because a pharmaceutical company decided that they could make a drug that would suppress the urge to shake your leg while you are sitting in a chair. The scientist that came up with this idea? Someone who grew up with me and was bugged by my legs constantly shaking.
One of the drugs to treat this “new” syndrome is called Restoril. I believe that this is the drug that I have heard might cause one to gamble, but do not quote me on this as I could not find this in all the drug information I looked at. Gamble? Did I want to gamble in all the time my legs were going a mile a minute? No.
Here are this drug’s “rare” side effects. This drug has caused people to get out of bed and drive vehicles, prepare and eat food, make phone calls, or have sex and they are not fully awake. And, the people do not remember that they have done any of these things. Gee — would you want to do any of these things and not remember? Can you just hear the defendant’s plea in court? “Honestly your honor, I did not know that I was committing rape! It was the drug I was taking!”
Other side effects of this drug are confusion; euphoria; tremors; restlessness – the thing this was supposed to relieve; memory loss – see above statement to the judge; sweating; hallucinations; and the list goes on. You can also suffer from fever, persistent sore throats, unusual paleness or tiredness, irregular heartbeat or yellowing of the skin and eyes. The serious bad reactions of this drug are rash, itching, severe dizziness or trouble breathing. Hmm…I think I would rather let my legs move up and down as if using a sewing machine treadle.
So the other syndrome I heard of is a new one. It is called shift work disorder. It is characterized as “…insomnia and excessive sleepiness affecting people whose work hours are scheduled during the typical sleep period.” How much of a bonus did the guy who came up with that name get? In my day, if you worked swing or the graveyard shift you worked your day around a sleep schedule that worked. Yes it took time to get into the groove, but you got into the groove without the need for drugs. Today there is a drug for this called Nuvigil.
What are the serious side effects of Nuvigil? A possible serious rash or allergic reaction that could effect your liver or blood cells and result in hospitalization as these maybe life threatening. You could end up with hives, again a skin rash, sores in your mouth, blisters, swelling, peeling or yellowing of the skin, trouble swallowing or breathing, dark urine or fever. Hmm…
Possible side effects require you calling your doctor or a trip to the emergency room for psychiatric symptoms that include depression, anxiety, hallucinations, an extreme increase in thoughts of suicide, aggression or “other mental problems.” What are the other mental problems? No idea. Nothing noted on what I was able to find.
Common side effects are headache, nausea, dizziness, or trouble sleeping. Trouble sleeping? Isn’t this drug supposed to help you sleep? The radio ad states that this drug will help you sleep, but may cause the inability to sleep. So how can this be good if the effect it is supposed to have can also be counteracted by the very same drug? Why, then, should this be taken?
Do I want to take either one of these drugs for these “new” disorders or syndromes? No. Why would I when I could be in worse shape after taking these drugs. This, then, begs the question: How do these drugs pass the FDA? Is the FDA being paid off, or are they using inappropriate antiquated standards? What could be behind all of this you ask? Money.
Have we become a society of self medicating hypochondriacs? Don’t worry about the side effects — you need this drug to cure what we think ails you. Read our ad in some named periodical and then ask your Doctor. Why are these two syndromes something to worry about today? Are they both just another excuse for what has become an “It’s not my fault” way of thinking?
In older times these two disorders or syndromes were nothing to be worried about. So my legs move a lot. So I work a swing or graveyard shift. I can change my habit patterns. Would you suffer the side effects of these two drugs or would you work your way around it? I want to hear from you!
Read Full Post »
New California Child Seat Law
Posted in Commentary, tagged booster seat, CA Senate Bill 929, Car Seat Laws, Jersey Shore, Politics, Snooki, Snooki Polizzi on January 12, 2012| 1 Comment »
At the beginning of this year the State of CA imposed a law that requires parents to secure their kids who are 8 years or younger and under 4’9″ in height in a car seat or booster seat in the rear of the vehicle! The law used to require this for kids under 6 and under 60 pounds.
I understand that the thinking is to protect children, however, the height requirement is what gets to me. The height requirement is pretty tall for a child. Think about it: Can you picture Snooki Polizzi from Jersey Shore in a car seat? Well, she meets the height requirement! How many children between the ages of 6 and 8 were injured in a car accident because they were not in a car seat? Those statistics are very hard to find…
I did find this comment by Scott Storms. He is a principal at AQCS Environmental. Mr. Storms says, “The California death rate of children 0-5 vs. 6-10 is very small ~2.5/100,000 and the groups are statistically indistinguishable. Since these two groups correspond fairly well to the groups of children effected by this bill, we can say that it indicates that the addition of booster seats to the older age group probably will not effect the already very low death rates. Thus, the utility of this bill questionable. If one takes into account the economic costs, which for many families will be in the form of purchasing and fueling a 3-row vehicle, and the ecological externalities; in the form of additional resource utilization and pollution, it is a bad idea.” Here is the link where I found this comment: http://www.aroundthecapitol.com/Bills/SB_929/20112012/
Then you have to ask the question: What if my child is 10 years old and is only 4’8″? How does one prove to the CA Highway Patrol, or local law enforcement that the child has past age limit? Will parents now need to carry birth certificates to prove the age of the child?
And how do you get a child of 7 who has not been in a car seat for a year back into a car seat? Well, there is an incentive for you to do so by the State to the tune of $475.
I understand that this is all to protect the safety of children, but what I want to know when the law will change again to encompass anyone under 4’9″
Read Full Post »